Skip to content
ZelientSecurity

Continuous exposure management

Every exposure, closed on the record.

Zelient reads what your scanners, cloud inventory and ticketing already know, collapses the duplicates, and drives each finding to a fix that is verified before it counts as closed.

Book a platform tourSee how a fix runs
  • Deploys in your cloud
  • Read-only by default
  • SOC 2 Type II
  • ISO 27001
zelient / exposure queue

12,480

Open exposures tracked

68%

Duplicate noise collapsed

6.2 days

Median time to close

1,284

Verified closures this week

  • critical

    Public S3 bucket exposes customer exports

    s3://nw-exports-prod · Cloud platform

    Verify fix
  • high

    Internet-facing host unpatched for CVE-2026-21874

    ip-10-42-8-19 · Infrastructure

    Assigned
  • high

    Service account holds unused owner role

    svc-deploy@northwind · Identity

    In review
  • medium

    Dependency with known RCE in build image

    orders-api:1.18.3 · Payments

    Assigned
  • medium

    TLS certificate expires in 9 days

    checkout.northwind.example · SRE

    Closed

Illustrative console · sample data

Security teams running Zelient

Northwind LogisticsHalden BankMeridian HealthCorvus RetailBluepeak InsuranceVantage TelecomKestrel EnergyArclight Media

Where remediation stalls

Detection is a solved problem. Closure is not.

Every security team we work with has more findings than it can close, and the backlog is not caused by a shortage of scanners. These four patterns account for most of it.

01

The same asset, nine times

Cloud posture, scanner and code tools each raise their own ticket for one machine. Analysts spend the morning merging duplicates instead of closing risk.

02

Severity without reachability

A critical score on a host that cannot be reached from the internet outranks a medium that quietly fronts your payment flow. The queue does not know the difference.

03

Nobody owns the fix

Findings land in a shared queue. Ownership is implied, never assigned, and the ticket ages while three teams assume someone else has it.

04

Closed tickets, open exposures

A ticket marked done is not evidence a fix shipped. Exposures reopen weeks later, and the audit trail shows a status change rather than a verified closure.

The platform

One path from raw signal to a signed-off fix

Seven stages run continuously. You can start with correlation and scoring, or turn on verification first and work backwards.

A rack of network hardware in a dim data centre
Correlation runs against the estate you already operate.

Photo Tyler on Unsplash

  1. 01

    Collect

    Read-only connectors pull findings, cloud inventory, code results and open tickets. Nothing is installed on the assets themselves.

  2. 02

    Normalise

    Every finding is mapped onto one asset model, so a host, a container and a repository are described the same way.

  3. 03

    Correlate

    Duplicates collapse into a single exposure with one owner, one score and one history.

  4. 04

    Score

    Reachability, exploit intelligence, data sensitivity and business weight combine into a score your team can defend.

  5. 05

    Route

    The exposure is assigned to the team that owns the asset, inside the ticketing tool they already work in.

  6. 06

    Verify

    Zelient re-checks the asset, collects the evidence and only then marks the exposure closed.

  7. 07

    Record

    Every step is written to an immutable trail: who decided, what changed, when it was proven.

Platform detail

How a fix runs

Written for the engineer holding the ticket

Context that never reaches the person doing the work is context wasted. Zelient puts the reachability, the blast radius and the rollback into the ticket itself.

An engineer reading output from a scan on a laptop

Photo Danial Igdery on Unsplash

  1. 1

    Triage

    The queue arrives sorted by what is reachable and what it protects, with duplicates already collapsed.

  2. 2

    Assign

    Ownership comes from the asset record, not from a guess in a stand-up. The ticket lands with the right team.

  3. 3

    Remediate

    Guidance is written for the engineer holding the ticket: the change, the blast radius, and how to roll it back.

  4. 4

    Prove

    The fix is re-checked against the original finding. Only a passing check closes the exposure.

Research

2026 Exposure Action Report

We analysed 4.2 million findings across 180 security teams to understand where remediation time actually goes: 61% of it is spent reconciling duplicates, not fixing anything.

  • Duplicate findings per asset: median 6.4
  • Share of criticals that were not internet reachable: 58%
  • Teams with a verified closure metric: 1 in 9
Request the report

Inside the report

Findings analysed
4.2M
Security teams surveyed
180
Median duplicates per asset
6.4
Critical findings not reachable
58%

For the whole team

Built for the people who carry the number

CISO

One number for exposure, with the evidence behind it, instead of a slide built from four tools.

Vulnerability management lead

A queue that reflects real risk and an owner on every item, without a spreadsheet to hold it together.

Security engineering and DevSecOps

Findings arrive with context and a runbook, in the tool the team already has open.

GRC and audit

Closure evidence collected as the work happens, exportable when the auditor asks.

Integrations

Fits the stack you already run

Zelient does not replace your tools. It reads them, and writes back where work already happens.

Vulnerability and cloud posture

  • Network and host scanners
  • Cloud security posture
  • Container and image scanning
  • Attack surface monitoring

Application security

  • Static analysis
  • Dependency and SCA
  • Secrets detection
  • Infrastructure as code

Workflow and records

  • ITSM and ticketing
  • Chat and on-call
  • CMDB and asset inventory
  • Identity providers

Field notes

All resources

Field note

Deduplication is a security control, not a cleanup task

When one asset produces nine findings, the queue stops describing risk. Here is how four teams rebuilt theirs.

7 min read · Photo Jake Walker on Unsplash

Research

Reachability changed how we triage. Here is the data

Scoring by reachability and data sensitivity moved 41% of a 60,000-finding backlog below the line nobody argues about.

9 min read · Photo Mario Gogh on Unsplash

Practice

Designing a closure metric your board will accept

Mean time to remediate rewards fast tickets. Verified closure rate describes what actually happened.

6 min read · Photo Cherrydeck on Unsplash

Put your own findings through it

Send us a read-only export from one scanner. We will return the deduplicated queue, the reachability scores and a closure plan, in your own data.

Book a platform tourhello@zelientsecurity.com